the holy wild


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 February
2007 January
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February

My Links
read the book
dovetailmyth
monergism
the classics

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



web page traffic counter
old navy

repentance?
12.01.05 (12:48 am)   [edit]

 
where is your God?
11.30.05 (7:43 am)   [edit]

theres a scene in the old testament where the prophet elijah calls out 400+ prophets of baal and challenges them to a battle of the gods. he lets them go first and after they are utterly spent calling on their god who has not answered he taunts them by saying "where is your God?"


i was reading over this passage and for reasons i cant quite explain i took the question personally and ran with it in my mind.


 




so


is


where     & nbsp;   &n bsp;   &nb sp;   &nbs p;     ;         & nbsp;   &n bsp;   &nb sp;   &nbs p;     ;           & nbsp;   &n bsp;   God?


my


    & nbsp;   &n bsp;  


ive thought long and hard about this for some time now. especially in light of events such as the tsunami and katrina and i think i have an idea.


hes sitting in a cardboard box under the freeway near downtown in desperate need of a meal. hes laying on his bed at the orphanage wondering why no one ever comes to visit unless its xmas. hes leaning against a cement wall behind bars waiting for some of his followers to take him seriously about that whole [i][b]least of these[/i][/b] thing.


this is where my God is. not in a palace or a sitting on a throne – but born into a feed trough and largely ignored ever since even by those who claim to be his followers both in his time and in ours. ive been seeking his presence for a long time now – wondering where he is when hes been waiting for me to come visit him under the freeway…in the orphanage…behind bars.

 
as i wait for you again
11.29.05 (11:17 am)   [edit]

 
conviction and the taco bell drive thru
11.28.05 (3:48 pm)   [edit]

ranting is so overrated. but alas - i have to rant about this. 


pulled into the taco bell drive thru today and ordered a #3 - no onions tomato or lettuce and a grilled steak burrito no hot sauce or beans with an xl mountain dew ez on the ice. i repeated my order slowly and articulately when asked and was told to drive up to the window. so i get to the window and the smiling lady asked me again to clarify my order. i did so politely as i understand how poorly the ordering mics work. its hard to understand anyone over the fuzz and breaks most the time. "i would like a grilled steak burrito." typically gets garbled into something like "i want to take over the world with my wmds." i believe this may have happened to some poor guy from iraq not long ago.


so i pay and pull up to get my order and the first thing i notice is that the lady at the window is handing me a regular drink. so i ask nicely if i didnt order an xl and she smiles and nods and exchanges the drink. very well - im not raising a fuss over this bc its just all too common. but after i get the bag to go and look at what i got - guess what? not even close to what i ordered. now i have two kids in the car with me and its a grand hassle to get them out and take them in just to get my order straight. and i shouldnt have to. its not my responsibility to make sure that the person working the drive thru understands english - thats taco bells job.


and herein is my gripe. i have no problem with people who come to this country looking for jobs to sustain their families. i think its admirable that they seek employment instead of simply suckling from welfare. but is it too much to ask that the person taking my order understand the language i am using to place it? should i have to know conversational spanish just to get my order placed correctly? its a quandry. knowing my spanish i would end up asking for directions to the bathroom.


so i pull around and go inside and ask them to correct the order. they were nice and polite and smiling the whole time and didnt seem upset or frustrated with me in the least. me on the other hand? im peeved at having to get out of my car bc if i wanted to get out of my car at taco bell i would have just done so in the first place. but as i waited i noticed how friendly and considerate they were. they even gave me an order of cinnistix to make up for it and thanked me for my patience as i turned to go.


so im back in my car on my way home thinking to myself - why am i so upset? its not as tho the drive thru lady set out to waste my time or give me the wrong order. its not as tho she maliciously entered the wrong items on the order screen. at least - i have no reason to think so. she is doing her best and im just showing a lack of compassion and tolerance. how very typical of me. and as i pondered these things i couldnt help but wonder if the second mile didnt include walking all the way into the taco bell when someone has made a mistake in taking my order.


so whats the moral? i dont know. ask kurt maddox. Ü

 
danu9 goes ballistic on the religion page
11.17.05 (9:34 am)   [edit]

i always enjoy seeing new faces on tblog and hearing fresh perspectives add their voice to the growing community here. however some additions seem to be a little too eager to add their voice.


take danu9 for example. im certain danu9 is a well meaning and sincere person who legitimately endeavors to pursue their faith with all their heart. im sure this has resulted in a desire to express and communicate that faith with others on a broad scale. im positive that danu9 has no ill intentions.


but of the last 50 posts in the religion section (not including this one) danu9 is responsible for all but 7. wow. what is that about?

 
paradigm shift
11.16.05 (10:03 am)   [edit]

 
there is no only
11.14.05 (4:49 pm)   [edit]

there is no truth


there is no lie


there is no way of ever knowing why


 


there is only love


there is only grace


there is only trusting in the look on Jesus face


 


there is no knowledge


there is no ignorance


there is no honest way to ever take a stance


 


there is only life


there is only faith


there is only time and we will all just have to wait


 


there is no wrong


there is no right


there is no sense taking sides on black and white


 


there is only you


there is only me


there is only living here pursuing unity


 


there is no loss


there is no lack


there is no breadcrumb trail to find our way back


 


there is only hope


there is only peace


there is only death and when it comes a restful release

 
whosever will
11.14.05 (1:32 pm)   [edit]



turn your cheek for me?


 


bite your tongue for me?


 


stay silent for me?


 


will you kill for a child?


 


will you kill for a cause?


 


will you kill for me?


 


burn your eyes for me?


 


starve yourself for me?


 


stay humble for me?


 


will you kill for revenge?


 


will your kill for pleasure?


 


will you kill for me?


 


leave your family?


 


run and hide or go to war?


 


will you do this for me?


 


will you lie?


 


will you cry?


 


will you die for me?


 

 
of doubts and intellectual integrity
11.14.05 (10:09 am)   [edit]
often i find myself processing a line of thinking that logically leads away from faith. i follow it to see how far it goes and in doing so i am made aware of the possibility of its veracity. in my experience doubts form in light of information but only remain if that information is not processed. as i process it and consider other perspectives and bounce ideas around what i generally find is that there can be just as much doubt about anything else as there is about God.

when i reach this point in the process i find that i have typically misjudged the power of faith and how it comes about in my life. my doubts are based on the premise that faith is inherent. but when i am reminded that faith is not by any means inherent - that it is a gift from God lest any man should boast - i come to the point where the faith implanted in me takes another step forward.

its not a simple process and its not always fun. its often frustrating and especially so in light of the vast majority of people who claim faith and utterly fail to exhibit it by asking themselves difficult questions about it. i guess static faith is possible tho i admit i dont quite understand how.
 
jellyfish anathema
11.12.05 (9:34 pm)   [edit]


if only i were a jellyfish


floating in the current


it would be much easier


and far more comfortable


than actually asking questions


that challenge peoples views


when its quite obvious


that those staunch and pious people


dont want their views challenged.


it would save me the trouble


of being on the brunt end


of an emotionally manipulative relationship


with a loved one.


i could just smile and m-hmm


and nod my way thru any tempest.


i could glide right along


with every half baked idea


because its what weve always been taught


and much older and wiser men


who have been studying this


for much longer than me


see it differently.


it would certainly keep


situations like tonights explosion


from even becoming a remote possibility.


 


but let me be anathema


because i think


and have the unmitigated gall


to question.


let me be accursed


because i have a thoroughly different


understanding from yours.


let me be damned


and may Gods peace


rest on you


and your comfortable beliefs.


amen.


 


maranatha.

 
falling into you
11.09.05 (11:42 pm)   [edit]

this is my sister in law fallingintoYou.



her blog is called jumping into the unknown and she spends most her time there wondering about life love God and how to steal my ideas and make them better. i wanted to give her some props bc shes cool and deserves em. and no - you cant have her number. =P

 
philip morris and the ultimate irony
11.08.05 (9:39 pm)   [edit]

saw a funny thing on tv tonite. one of the largest producers of cigarettes in the world - philip morris international - had a commercial on the tely advertizing that they (get this) want people to stop smoking.


er...


so i went on their site this evening and looked around to assure myself that some rogue gang of pirating irony monkeys hadnt hijacked my local broadcasting affiliate. and there it was in all its glory - a front page full of statements about how concerned pmi is about the health risks of smoking on the consumer and how they are dedicated to working toward a solution.


er…


i followed one of the main sublinks to a statement page that included the following quotes:


In fact, because of the serious health effects of our products, we believe we must stop children from smoking.


…we are committed to working with all of society to bring about a long-term solution.


We recognize the importance of our role and will actively help find a solution.


We currently support some 100 youth anti-smoking programs in nearly 90 countries, focusing on teaching children to decide against smoking and on establishing laws to prevent them from buying cigarettes.


PMI is a company that demands a high ethical standard of its employees and in turn of itself. As a responsible cigarette manufacturer, we believe in the principle of adult choice. Cigarettes are a legal product that many adults enjoy, notwithstanding the serious health issues surrounding smoking.


er…


so as a concerned citizen of the global economy with an eye toward ethical business practices i wanted to help pmi. i wanted to give them my concentrated efforts in hopes of assisting their valiant cause. and i brainstormed for the better part of a nanosecond before coming up with the ultimate sure-fire answer for pmi. ready? here it is:


 


stop making cigarettes.



 


or at least – for the sake of people like me who are especially sensitive to the dangerous subtleties of such impious irony – stop making the commercials.


 

 
hardwood floors cause me to sin
11.08.05 (1:35 pm)   [edit]

its true. let me splain.


i hate shoes. never have liked them and cant stand wearing them - even for a good cause like um...i dunno of any. so i have to wear something on my feet when i go out to social events bc people are just weirded out when i dont. especially at church which i cant grasp bc most everybody in the bible was either barefoot or wearing sandles. anyway - as i dont live in a state that fears the complexities of seasonal changes ie - cold weather - my usual attire consists of flipflops.


so anyway - around the house i prefer being barefoot. every house ive ever lived in has had carpet or if it had tile/hardwoods there have always been rugs. but our current house is a peer and beam and our living room and kitchen are of a continuous wood flooring. its nice looking and gives the house a very antiquated feel which the wifey digs. that fact and our current poverty factor are why we dont have rugs here.


but the problem is that barefeet on hardwoods attract whatever particles of whatever foods and/or dirt and/or whatever else. my thing about not having things on my feet is not just about shoes. i absolutely hate foreign particles clinging to my feet - especially if i am walking around or standing in the kitchen doing dishes or whatever. it is simply maddening and makes me wanna cuss. i find myself acting like a cat taking a step or two and shaking my paws to get the stuff off. i particularly despise coming into the main part of the house after a relxing shower wherein i have thoroughly cleaned my feet and not two steps into the kitchen ive got a smal armada of junk on my soles again. being unable to stride from refreshing shower to the living room couch without a congrgegation of who knows what appearing on my feet makes me wanna cuss. so ive ended up most of the time wearing flipflops inside my house too which - you guessed it - makes me wanna cuss.


and for those who are wondering 'why doesnt he just sweep?' this reveals that you have never lived in a place with hardwoods bc no amount of sweeping gets rid of all the stuff and the first time anyone goes into or out of the house a whole new batch of positively-attracted-to-m y-feet kind of stuff arrives on the floor and begins making its way around to wherever my feet must surely land. its neverending which makes me wanna cuss some more.


father forgive me for i have sinned. Ü

 
who is this satan character anyway?
11.08.05 (9:05 am)   [edit]

been in several discussions lately and people all over the place seem to think satan is still just as powerful as he ever was and has been personally messing with them. this is bothering me for a bunch of reasons but i wanted to get some other perspectives on it.


so what do you guys think? whats the situation with satan these days? does he go after people? does he still have any power? is he just an amalgum in our collective conscious? what are your thoughts?

 
reach
11.07.05 (12:38 pm)   [edit]
 
risk
11.05.05 (12:04 am)   [edit]

 
wrestling
11.03.05 (7:38 pm)   [edit]

i will not hide


from you


i will not run


from you


is there any place that i can go?


is there any grace that i can know?


just want to hear


from you


 


its like wrestling with an angel


i will not let go


of you


 


i wont walk away


from you


i wont turn my face


from you


is there any place that i can go?


is there any grace that i can know?


just need a word


from you


 


its like wrestling with an angel


i will not let go


of you


 


i want to wait


on you


i want to trust


on you


is there any place that i can go


is there any grace that i can know


just draw me near


to you


 


its like wrestling with an angel


i will not let go


of you


 


will you change my name


will you change my heart


will you change my mind


will you change me

 
Jesus contemplating the 2nd amendment
11.01.05 (10:39 am)   [edit]


i posted this pic on an internet forum in a discussion about xian pacifism. the picture was deemed offensive and removed. the point of it is exactly that - if we find such a picture of Christ offensive shouldnt we then also find such ideals among his followers offensive?