|
a few selections from penn and tellers war on the war on drugs. "if you live in a free country you have the right to put anything you want into your own body. anything else is bs." p&t are unwittingly displaying whats wrong with the very notion of freedom. ultimately true freedom means no restrictions and this is apparently what they want. interestingly enough its what i want too but not in the same way. see - they want this freedom without any change in the hearts of the people receieving it. what a complete disaster waiting to happen that is. instead my desire is freedom in christ for all who will repent and turn from their own way. as paul stated in galatians 5:1 it was for freedom that christ set us free and i believe this is the only freedom man can ever possibly know. if scripture is correct then when all is said and done there will be a new world of people free in christ co-existing in perfect peace without a hint of sin. im pretty sure p&t havent thot that far in advance on their little scheme bc it wont have nearly as happy an ending. "the freedom to get blind stinking drunk remains every americans right provided they dont harm anyone else - and thats the way it should be in any country that wants to call itself free." ah the prevaling virtue of our day rears its ugly head - as long as you dont hurt anyone... what they fail to account for is the damage all these drugs affect on the lives of everyone related to the user in any number of different ways. from psychological harm to emotional distress to betrayal of trust issues. these issues arent merely results of the criminalization of drugs - they are the result of the damaging effects of drug use. the only way to use drugs and not harm anyone is to exist in a vacuum. their follow up point about the govt inadvertantly creating a black market is an interesting one bc it assumes that its the govts fault for people wanting a harmful substance enough to break the law to get it and that they should have it as a right instead. the ultimate logical end of this thinking is that there should be no laws bc laws are why people do bad things. this is an assenine proposition and they obviously havent thot it thru. they just want to make a tv show with controversial topics for the sake of ratings. the problem is that our sinful nature is at work and these two pundits dont have any grasp of that. paul states clearly in romans that law brings out the worst in folks. not bc the law is bad - but bc people are sinful. p&t take the oppsite view that people are okay and the law is jacked up. now dont get me wrong - the whole war on terror thing is out of control and worthless. watch cops sometime as police brutalize a guy for a dimebag. when the present laws reach the streets what we basically end up with is the justification of criminal solicitation for the sake of seizure and incarceration of the buyer. but what happens when they get out? no change is affected and 99% recommit. and the drug producers arent bothered much despite the occassional search and seizure of a bahaman bank account for pr. "voodoo pharmacology is basically the idea that drugs make people do bad things. that drugs take control of you. whats different about the illegal drugs is that they sieze control of you and force you to sin." this isnt voodoo its real. drugs alter the way you think feel and react to things. if they didnt no one would be paying for and taking them. if they didnt meth users as an example wouldnt have a radically noticeable alteration in the size of functioning brain mass. as they wind down - all their positive evidence basically only supports marijuana legalization but they didnt offer an ounce of positive feedback for heroin crack meth x or any other illegal drugs. so i guess maybe they just want marijuana legal? or maybe they figured they should stand on their strongest leg. as we can easily see with the shiftiness of the tobacco companies (rent and watch the insider) theres absolutely no guarantee that legalizing these other drugs for recreational use will not end up in a whole new batch of problems when the corporations get their mits on production. in the end they are simply willing to trade one criminally insensitive hierarchy for another - pablo escobar for philip morris "as americans we have an inalienable right to make up our minds about what substances we want to take into our bodies." what? this guy obviously hs no understanding of what an inalienable right is or how that term was derived. well - either that or he dont give a rip about watering down the term for his own use to bolster his claim. yah - prolly that. "people have a right to control their bodies. to control what goes into their bodies. to control their minds ultimately bc thats what youre talking about if youre talking about a psychoactive drug youre talking about controlling the contents of your mind." i dont think this guy realizes the words that are coming out of his mouth. he seems to think that someone using psychoactive drugs is somehow in control of their minds. once again i must remind everyone that drugs alter the way you think feel and react to things and that this is precisely why people pay for and take them. but this necessarily includes a lowered sense of control. basically what hes arguing for is the ability to control how much or how little control of our minds we want to have. but that sounds like the same problem people are always griping about with religion - that people have surrendered their own thots for other thots. and when this happens with respect to God its a bad thing but apparently just fine in terms of drug use. whatever. my advice is dont be fooled - p&t are as good at propaganda as anyone else in the business. go research this stuff for yourself.
|