| inerrrrrrancy |
 Blog For Free! Archives Home 2009 January 2007 February 2007 January 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February My Links read the book dovetailmyth monergism the classics tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog 
|
posted by: 69whisper (reply) post date: 09.14.06 (7:54 am) God only knows !!! posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 09.26.06 (3:59 am) I'm with 69 whisper on this one. But then I don't think God wasted his time trying to help determine the way men understand him. No God who loves us would be quite so crytic, and since I think God DOES love us, it's no great stretch for me to accept that MEN tried to make the Bible a good and helpful thing, but since, in fact, it was men (and women, of course) passing on the way THEY had come to understand God, the errors are both (a.) not surprising, and (b.) easily acceptble, and (c,) subject to the same error rate as any other thing that comes from the heads and hands of well meaning but flawed men. As for dealing with people who believe the inerrancy thing? Good luck. Like talking to a wall, albeit a really faithful wall. posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 09.26.06 (4:02 am) oops... please remove the word "both" from the above comment, or maybe it will be corrected in one of the subsequent translations. posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 09.26.06 (4:02 am) oops... please remove the word "both" from the above comment, or maybe it will be corrected in one of the subsequent translations. posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 09.26.06 (4:02 am) oops... please remove the word "both" from the above comment, or maybe it will be corrected in one of the subsequent translations. posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 09.26.06 (4:09 am) great... hope you don't mind doing some deleting. posted by: graceshaker (reply) post date: 10.04.06 (12:45 pm) its ok. i dont expect inerrancy from a human surry. Ü ps - like the thot about really faithful walls...lol posted by: Ted Clore (Tallen) (reply) post date: 11.20.06 (12:30 pm) Inerrancy is a myth, a philosophical position that scripture never supports. The truth of the matter is that a sovereign God protects his infallible word, and can even use a dumb ass to proclaim his message. ;) posted by: Chris Risen (reply) post date: 01.09.07 (1:10 pm) Hmm...you've got me thinking about this one. I believe that God in His sovereignty sends His word out to those that would hear. And He makes sure that those that are listening for His word are able to understand it. In other words, He adapts it to the language that the individual understands. The inerrancy lies not in God's very word, but simply within those that are partakers of His word. We should be reminded that His word is living and breathing. Father, please pour Your wisdom out over us that we may better know Your will, ways, and word. Amen. |
|